Read e-book Biotic Homogenization

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Biotic Homogenization file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Biotic Homogenization book. Happy reading Biotic Homogenization Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Biotic Homogenization at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Biotic Homogenization Pocket Guide.

Each region was sampled twice: the first one between May and July, and the second between August and September. All beetles were identified to species level with the help of experts see Acknowledgements. Species that could not be identified in the field were collected and identified to species level with the help of experts see Acknowledgements. Lepidoptera were surveyed following a line-transect method in each of the grassland EPs between May and August Three surveys per grassland EP were conducted in a randomized sequence per region. Surveys consisted of a min walk along each transect during which all individuals within 2.

Individuals were identified to species level 51 in the field unless the taxonomic identity was unclear, in which case, specimens were kept for later identification by dissection of genitalia in the laboratory. Trait information was compiled from the literature for all species identified in our study.

Adult feeding breadth, larval feeding breadth, relative body size and activity period were used as response variables.

  • Causes and consequences of biotic homogenization in freshwater ecosystems;
  • The Making of Chaucers English: A Study of Words (Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature)?
  • Spatial Economic Analysis - Volume 1, Issue 2.

Feeding breadth was categorized as specialist feeding on species within one family or generalist feeding on species within more than one family. Activity period was recorded as the number of months for which adults are active. Body size was defined as relative body size, which was calculated as the log difference between actual body size and the community average within each order. By considering body size as a relative measure within each order the influence of taxonomic difference on the overall trends of the community response to intensification was reduced.

In-field management intensity was defined through the land-use-intensity index 16 , which incorporates fertilizer inputs, mowing intensity and grazing intensity. For each grassland EP k , the land-use-intensity index L k is defined as the square root of the sum of the three variables, each standardized by the regional mean of that variable;. We used the mean L k for the years — as this best reflects the ongoing management intensity and has been shown to have a stronger effect on arthropod activity than single year indices Land cover features were classified in eight generalized categories arable, forest, grasslands: managed grasslands and semi-natural vegetation, roads, trees: woodlots smaller than 1 ha, urban areas and water bodies; Supplementary Fig.

Landscape-scale simplification was represented by both compositional heterogeneity measured as Shannon diversity of land cover types 18 , 54 and configurational heterogeneity average patch size within the surrounding landscape 18 , We chose Shannon diversity as a measure of compositional heterogeneity, rather than, for example, the proportional area of semi-natural habitats or non-arable land 55 , as our study includes many taxa that use and exploit a wide variety of different habitat types, and while Shannon diversity is highly correlated with the proportional area of arable fields in the landscapes, it displayed a wider range and a complementary independent gradient to landscape configurational heterogeneity.

These two spatial scales were chosen to identify field-scale and landscape-scale effects. Data from all sampling dates were pooled for each taxon and Hellinger transformations, using vegan package in R 56 , were applied to standardize abundance across taxa and to account for the long environmental gradients represented by the three regions For RLQ analysis, the R- and Q-tables first underwent principle component analysis the Q-table using the Hill and Smith method 58 for mixing quantitative variables and factors and the L-table underwent correspondence analysis.

RLQ analysis was conducted using the ade4 package in R Clusters within RLQ component-space were identified following Kleyer et al. The degree of correlation between species-traits and response groups is expressed in correlation ratios. Analyses were conducted using R-codes adapted from those provided as Supplementary Material in Kleyer et al.

Spatial autocorrelation was not observed. Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization. Tscharntke, T. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management.

Supporting Information

Olden, J. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends Ecol. Clavel, J. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization. McKinney, M. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Devictor, V. Functional biotic homogenization of bird communities in disturbed landscapes. Global Ecol. On defining and quantifying biotic homogenization. Yachi, S.

Tag: Biotic Homogenization — Oceans Deeply

Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: The insurance hypothesis. Natl Acad. USA 96 , — Dirzo, R.

Biotic Homogenization

Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science , — Mouillot, D.


A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. Rader, R.

The winners and losers of land use intensification: pollinator community disassembly is non-random and alters functional diversity. Diversity Distrib 20 , — Configurational landscape heterogeneity shapes functional community composition of grassland butterflies. Ecol 52 , — Traits of butterfly communities change from specialist to generalist characteristics with increasing land-use intensity.

Basic Appl.

Duflot, R. Landscape heterogeneity as an ecological filter of species traits. Acta Oecol. Kormann, U. Local and landscape management drive trait-mediated biodiversity of nine taxa on small grassland fragments. Hendrickx, F. How landscape structure, land-use intensity and habitat diversity affect components of total arthropod diversity in agricultural landscapes. A quantitative index of land-use intensity in grasslands: integrating mowing, grazing and fertilization. Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes—eight hypotheses. Fahrig, L. Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.

Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method. Tews, J.

Biotic homogenization

Addicott, J. Ecological neighborhoods—scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49 , — Thies, C. Effects of landscape context on herbivory and parasitism at different spatial scales. Oikos , 18—25 Smith, A. Landscape size affects the relative importance of habitat amount habitat fragmentation and matrix quality on forest birds. Ecography 34 , — Farmlands with smaller crop fields have higher within-field biodiversity. Environ , — Sterns, S.

The influence of size and phylogeny on patterns of covariation among life-history traits in the mammals. Oikos 41 , — Greenleaf, S. Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia , — Holt, R. Moretti, M.